Wednesday, September 21, 2011

The Cloud: A misunderstood technology term.

If you were to take the sum of all things assigned the attribute of "cloud computing" you would have a definition that encompasses every technology know to man that ever though of being on the web. I think understanding what the cloud is can start with understanding what it is not.

First of all a remote connection to a terminal session to run applications on a desktop located somewhere far away is not cloud computing. It is a pretty cool thing to be able to do, and the technology behind it is pretty cool as well, but it is an "old school" solution to the very problem that the cloud addresses, which is what if I need access to my information and I'm not near my computer or in my office. When I say "old school" - you must remember that this type of terminal processing is where we started with mainframe computers and dummy terminals. Use this technology where it is beneficial, but don't call it cloud computing.

Secondly cloud computing is not just a really fancy web site. If your web site allows customers to log in, place orders and check order status - you have accomplished a very important business process using web technology, but you are not cloud computing. Again this type of technology is really cool, but not really cloud.

So what then is cloud computing? ... Well that is an excellent question. I believe that at the core of cloud computing you have processes, data and communication elements that are not directly tied to a specific application (web or otherwise). These elements are available however to any number of applications that my require them, or may even be used in a custom solution. There is also an element in the cloud of combining these various elements from various sources on the web, so for example you may have a web portal that uses Windows Live to authenticate a user, mapquest to provide mapping data, and weather information from weather.com. Additionally this portal may also include elements from your own network to pull together a complete experience. And just to really drive the point home this same experience may be available in another applcation that uses web service to gather the necessary information, or even on your phone.

In the cloud the various experiences are centered around processes that you are involved in, rather than a particular place you work - or even a particular computer or piece of software. Microsoft has made Exchange (amoung other things) available as a service in the cloud. Now you can setup Exchange without having to worry about the server. Once setup it addresses the processes around contacts, calendaring and messaging. Any number of applications including a web portal interface, outlook, your phone or some custom application can help you perform the processes your require all centered around a single source of data.

Microsoft cloud services are perfect for your business!

Cloudy with a chance of profit!

It is difficult to imagine a scenario where cloud computing would not save any sized business a great deal of expense, and therefore allow that company to make more money and spend more time doing exactly what they do.

In the smallest of scenarios lets say that you are a business with just a few people involved and you have the need to communicate with one another. Lets also assume that you have the need to be mobile because you don't exactly have an office - you are in fact the new improved "lean mean virtual company". Your needs may look like this:

Microsoft in the Cloud


  • The ability to communicate by eMail
  • The ability to work on shared documents
  • The ability to conduct web-conferences and meetings
  • The ability to check your eMail / calendar and contacts from anywhere you are.
  • The ability to have all your eMail / calendar / contacts / tasks and notes all synchronized to your phone.
  • In simpler terms you need access to your stuff any time and anywhere.
Lets just leave it at that for now ... I'm sure you can think up some additional requirements. Basically you have three possible choices
  1. On Premesis - Get a Small Business Server, connect it to the internet and start setting things up to work.
  2. Hosted - Try to find an ISP (Internet service provider) that meets all of these needs. (Good luck)
  3. Leverage the cloud by using Services already running and avilable.
The on premesis solution is one I'm quite familiar with - I've done a lot of that and I can tell you that you'll spend a minimum of 3000.00 on a decent server running Microsoft Small Business Server. The good news is that Small Business Server has all the stuff you need - it is just costly to configure. This costly configuration can be outsources, but will cost thousands to implement and then some on-going costs to keep it running. Even if to save money you "host" it in your home office with a fixed IP internet connection you are still conservatively north of $10,000.00 in cost.

The hosted situation is one that I've avoided because it is VERY difficult to find a good hosted solutions provider. Hosting a simple web site or application isn't too much trouble, and its pretty easy to find eMail hosting, but when you start trying to integrate documents and custom business process stuff it falls short. I will say that this can be a good solution for a small business becasue the cost can be so low. I just hope for your sake that you find the right hosting provider.


And the winner is ...
The cloud is perfect for this solution ... in fact you can get it all for less than $20.00 per person each month with Microsoft. Microsoft is commited to the cloud and the offer excellent solutions:
You get the power of Exchange for email, contacts, calendaring, notes and tasks which can be accessed from your computer, someone elses computer using the web interface and even from your phone!

You get the power of Sharepoint for managing the documents in your business and the use of Net Meeting to conduct virtual meetings when you need to.

The best news of all is that all the interfaces are designed to be simple to manage. All the complex stuff is taken care of - you just setup your users and start working immediately!

Understanding the cloud by its counter parts.

Types of Computing

On Premesis Computing

On premesis computing is the typical scenario where all of the necessary infrastructure necessary to your processes is located in your physical location.
  • I buy my own hardware.
  • I manage my own data center.
  • I have complete control and responsibility for my systems.
  • I am heavily invested in capital costs.

Hosted Computing

Hosted computing is where you outsource certain physical portions of your IT infrastructure to a hosting company. This is typeically done by either shared hosting or by leased servers depending on the requirements.
  • I specify my hardware requirements.
  • I pay for a fixed capacity.
  • In a shared hosting environment I only control the services I need such as web application hosting.
  • I am not required to do updates so my maintenance cost is lowered.
  • My services may go down for routine maintenance at times I do not control.
  • I probably have restricted bandwitdth that cannot be easily changed.

Cloud Computing

Cloud computing is something new. Basically it could be described as utility computing where you only pay for the actual consumption of resources you require at any given time.
  • I can purchase computing power on the fly.
  • I have no hardware specification requirements only service requirements.
  • I pay for only the data storage I require.
  • I can configure the computing and storage services to meet my exact requirements.
  • I can manage my computing resources myself.
  • My resources are abstracted from a pool of servers so uptime is guaranteed at 99.99%
  • I pay as I go for only the services I require.
  • I can scale up my computing power and storage requirements any time I need to and then scale them back down again if I so desire.

Lets talk abou the elephant shaped cloud in the room!

Watching vendors scramble around making claims that they are the very essence of cloud computing is quite amusing. In more cases than not what is actually happening is that they are attempting to clothe themselves in a brand new shiny computing term in an effort to remain relevant in the world of technology. The sad part is that people don't really stop to consider what this new term really means or to consider to any great degree what the implications are.
This whole conversation reminds me of a similar discussion years ago in the realm of computer service. Back then the brand new shiny technology term was "help desk" and vendors started the process of using the term with a great deal of awe. Their clients joined in the excitement and in many cases started writing checks to make sure that they were on the cutting edge of this grand new technology. I like everyone else involved in computer service had to determine my position in this bright new world ... and I did. I simply said that the new term was quite easy to understand ... it meant to put a process and supporting systems in place to help people fix their own problems. It isn't a real complicated process, but it did have some strong ramifications - especially if the person you were applying the concept to had no desire to "fix it themselves".

The new fervor about computing in the cloud isn't unlike the help desk experience ... there are lots of specifications, terms, discussions and claims being made about the cloud and who is and isn't really ready for the new world, but there is also a very simple concept in play that has actually been a part of the business process equation for quite some time. It is the age old tension between component stereo and the convenient "all in one" unit. Audiophiles will for the most part tell you that to truly have the ultimate audio experience you should use components allowing you to select each unit based on its own merits. On the other hand there are people out there who swear that if you simply have the "right" unit that you don't need to bother with all that other stuff. So the question remains ... do I buy the Bose wave player, or do I start collecting the best components I can find for each need. (amp, speakers, cp player, etc..) I guess the other option to consider is that I could hire an acoustic engineer to design a system for my home or office.

So am I the only person that is wondering why this whole discussion is vendor focused instead of customer focused. For decades we have been ensnared by thinking that we can implement technology just because it exists.
  •  Is it possible that every individual has different needs, requirements and budgets?
  • Is it possible that there is something simple that we are all missing as we try to understand how to exist in this brave new world of technology?
  • Is there and elephant like that in the room?
I think the answer involves communication ... the real power of the cloud is simply an expansion of a concept that has been around for years, but hopefully with the cloud will gain more traction. I'm not talking about communication with other people I'm speaking of communication between our "systems" that causes us to have a more beneficial technology experience. The communication capability allows each provider to focus on their strong suit and allows the consumer to benefit from everyone seamlessly.

Let me explain by examples ...

Microsoft offers "Exchange" in the cloud ... simply put you can "pay as you go" for all the best benefits of an exchange server for your eMail, contacts, etc... So now I connect to my exchange server using my iPhone (Another really cool technology) and see that I have a message from a client that needs me to come see him. In one simple touch of my clients address I'm magically transported to my mapping application where I can now use a GPS to help me navigate to the site. While I'm doing the driving I call my secretary to add the appointment to my calendar. (Which of course magically shows up on my phone) After the appointment I make some notes on the appointment, which now becomes part of my documentation necessary for billing and mileage reimbursement. I could expand on this example, but you get the point ... multiple vendors ... multiple sources of data ... one fluid process!

The concept of the cloud says that as a consumer I don't have to find a "single" vendor to handle the various needs of my day, I just need the tools that can communicate with other tools to provide me a fluid experience. I know this is a simple example, but it really helps drive the point home ... I don't have my resume on my web site because LinkedIN does a great job of hosting a much  more advanced resume for me on their site, and I can simply reference it from my site. The same is true of Twitter ... I can use twitter for "micro updates" on various topics and simply feed that content onto my site.

The cloud is about separating the data, application and process in a way that makes it possible for a consumer to use the best components for each part of the process. Communication is the key!

How to get a new web site ...

This BLOG is based on numerous conversations with people about their experiences in acquiring a web site.

Requirements First!

It is not a good idea to do a web site just because your competition has one - that may be a motivating factor, but it won't really yield much success. It is much more important for you to consider what the "site" or "web application" needs to do for you! Here are a few "rules" to follow before you start calling potential vendors about your site:
  1. Write down what the web site should "do" without using technology terms.
  2. Use ideas you see on other web sites, but be sure to apply those ideas to your needs.
  3. Think about your potential clients ... what will they be looking for when they come to your site.
  4. As for your home page ... consider this ... if you only have 10 seconds to tell a potential client what they need to know about you, what would you say?
  5. If one of your clients or potential client come to your site what questions might they want answered?
  6. How will people find out about your site?
  7. Can you break down the various requirements and prioritized them so that if money becomes an issue you know what you can live without.
By clearly mapping out your requirements it is far more likely that you won't be "sold" on a site that doesn't really meet your needs. It also allows you to clearly measure differences between vendors based on how they address your needs.

Ownership is Important

There are some things about a web site that you MUST handle yourself ... becasue it is your site. If you outsource these things the result will probably not be what you were hoping for.
  1. You should control all of your content - don't let someone else put words in your mouth.
  2. You need to register your own domain name - setup your own account with a registrar like GoDaddy.
  3. You need to have your own hosting account - you can't really do this until you select a developer because there may be requirements for the hosting company to meet based on the sites functionality.

A few things about vendors

Here are some things you should probably know about vendors and how they might impact your site. They are not all the same, and some will be better suited to help you with your needs.
  1. Designers - some vendors are excellent at design the work they do will be beautiful, but may not be very functional. On the up side your clients will be quite impressed with your site, but on the down site graphics don't do very well on search engines, and sometimes what your site does is more important that how it looks.
  2. Developers - Web developers are all about function, so your site will end up very functional, but it may not have the visual appeal you require.
  3. Template Sites and Content Managers - In order to provide sites at a VERY reasonable rate there are vendors that provide template sites and content managers. Basically what this means is you pick a pre-done design and then insert and manage your own content. On the up side this is an extremely inexpensive way to get a site which is great for some organizations. The down side is that in the fiercly competetive marketplace you may need to control the design as well as the content to make sure your site visitors stay with you
  4. SEO & SEM Vendors - these guys are really good at getting your site exposure on the internet through the various search engines. This one is tricky because your success with your site may depend on search engines, but a site optimized for search engines is probably not nearly as appealing to people. You also have to be careful because it is much easier in this field to make promises that can't be kept. (SEO - Search Engine Optimization, SEM - Search Engine Marketing)
Emmaus Road Productions is a group that focuses on Development and Design by having staff that have strengths in both. We really don't do any template sites, although we have recommended them numerous times because it was the best fit. As far as SEO we can help, but bear in mind that this can be a real "money pit" - so be careful!
Well that should help you get started on your pursuit of a good web site. I hope this helps ...

The Cloud and Relationships

Relationships in the cloud ...

The more important point about the cloud is not the individual company, but rather the ties between companies. Most companies have put lots of energy and resources into streamlining their business processes within their own company, but once they start to interact with other companies the processes start to break down because of disparity between how each business handles their own internal process.

Most of the proponents of cloud computing are expressing the benefits with the individual company in mind and overlooking the most powerful benfit of the cloud which is how processes span the boundries of various businesses. As individuals people are seeing the benefits of this new thought already ... for example why would I put a resume on my web site when I can simply use LinkedIn to provide that for me and then link directly to it. I'm not saying I shouldn't have my own web site I just need to use the best solution for each individual aspect of what I use the internet for. Facebook does a wonderful job of allowing me to share my personal adventures, pictures and thoughts with people who desire to be connected to me, so why should I do that sort of thing on my web site.

I can't internalize relationships and the cloud offers me the mechanism to manage those relationships using tools that are widely accepted. I could attempt to train my friends and family to come to my web site to see what is going on with me, but why would I do that?

The same principal will hold true for my business once this aspect of the cloud is adopted. Soon I'll be able to have information available in the cloud for my CPA to work on without having to take a box of papers up to his office. The outcome of his work will then seamlessly integrate right into my company systems.

Fonts on the web ... Great Misunderstanding!

Fonts - Tricky on the web! ...

Fonts can be used on printed documents to really accent your message - unfortunately this is not true on the internet. There are some choices for font families that can be used, but different browsers, operating systems and configurations will cause the fonts to be rendered differently. Here are some examples of the five primary choices and how they appear on your browser.

Old John Deer Tractor (Shelby County Fair)FAMILY: sans-serif
FAMILY: serif
FAMILY: cursive
FAMILY: fantasy
FAMILY: monospace

Specific font choices can be made, but the browser displaying the web page will make a substitution if the font is not available on the system. (For example a Windows computer does not come standard with the Helvetica font, but the Arial or Tahoma font on the PC may be used when a "sans-serif" font is called for.)

Beyond using these generic font families you have the choice of using "pictures of words" to display your message so that every browser will render exactly the same thing. This allows you exact control of the site visually but it does have several disadvantages:
  1. Search engines cannot read pictures making your site more difficult to rank.
  2. Updates to your site are more difficult because changes means uploading new images.
  3. Your site will take longer to load into a browser.
Silverlight (The technology used to produce the banner on this site) allows the font to be embedded so that it will be properly rendered on the target computer.

Faith, Hope and Love - A Programmers View

Learning just how much it isn't about me!

Several years ago I heard a message by a friend of mine on “Faith, Hope and Love.” I don’t remember much about his message, but it started me on a quest to find out how these three things interacted. As a programmer I needed to know how these things worked. I thought I needed to be more adequately prepared to put them to use in my own life, however my journey would teach me something completely different –

God really is sovereign and I really am not - in fact is is humiliating just how much "it" is not about me.

I formulated a theory and so far I believe the theory to hold true.

The theory is… “Faith is a catalyst that acts on hope to produce love

Washington Panda - Faith Hope and Love

Faith is a free gift of God – As a human being I cannot “muster up” faith – I must depend on the spirit. Lord I believe – please help my unbelief.

Love and works in this context are interchangeable. From the human perspective any act of love can be mimicked. (I have yet to come up with an exception) – so I find that I cannot “muster up” love either, in fact mimicked love is actually sin.

So I am left with hope – initially I was quite discouraged by this since I had spent many years under the notion that hope referred to something to come in the future – ie heaven. The more I studied the scriptures regarding hope I found that hope kept getting larger and larger. I struggled to put a definition to “hope” that really helped me understand what it was, and I was growing concerned because hope seemed to be the only part of this equation that I had anything to do with.

He is hope, and the more I know Him and am known by Him the more equipped my life is to produce love. It is interesting that in Matthew 7:21-23 – the claims of the condemned were seemingly very cool spiritual acts, but Jesus said the issue was that they didn’t have the relationship. Faith didn’t have hope to act on in their lives – what looked like acts of love were actually sin.
  • I have found that if I focus too much attention on faith – I tend toward “name it and claim it” doctrines.
  • I have found that if I focus too much attention on love – I tend toward legalism.
  • I have found that if I focus on Him (hope) – I become a vessel better fit for what he would desire to do through me.
I hope this note to you is born out of a prompting by God to spill out of the hope in my life and be a blessing to you. I pray that it is not pride causing me to want to look spiritual in front of a man. Weird – the same act could be sin or love depending on how it was born.

Change: The Inauguration - Observations in DC

Arriving in DC on Friday before the Tuesday Inauguration we had no idea what to expect. The days leading up to the big event left mixed messages. Our excitement was building that we may be witnessing some pretty historic things as the big day approached.
We met many people with very interesting stories. We now have new friend in a junior high principal from the Bronx borough in New York. As we visited with this middle school principal and her mother and son talking about everything from our children to comparing the subways between NY and DC I noticed that our different races were just not an issue. In retrospect I believe this is exactly the type of relationship Dr. King spoke of in his great address. He wasn’t looking for change in American government – he just wanted America to become color blind. In the end we exchanged eMail’s so that we could continue this friendship and exchange pictures.
Another new friend from Toronto, Ontario told us about her family’s adventure to get to DC – which was not dissimilar to ours. She like another good friend of ours is in a mixed marriage, but it just really didn’t matter – we were bound together by our adventure as people. We talked for a good while about our children and how they were learning and growing as we were going through this adventure. She told us about a man she met from South Africa and chronicled his adventure to get here.

In the days prior to the inauguration there was a real excitement in everyone we met.

And then change happened …

It was the big day – we started out on the Metro at 5:30 in the morning to be able to get through what would be crowds bigger than what the city was equipped to handle. At our final subway stop we got off the train onto a platform that was overwhelmed with people. It was quite difficult to stay on the platform a safe distance from the trains coming in to the station. A police officer and several metro employees tried to guide the crowd into an orderly line that would flow all the way to the end of the platform and then back to help get everyone out without injury. We were the only one of a few that did as we were asked – the rest pressed in, broke the line and ignored the pleas for order from the officer. Shortly after disembarking the Metro announced they were closing that station. I guess they just gave up.

We were on the street now and had our tickets with directions for how we were to get to our assigned gate. We walked down the assigned street among a sea of people toward the security checkpoint and then we stopped. Initially we figured it was just too early, but later we learned that the path had been blocked with metal barriers. This seemed very strange since we had followed the path to the mall that was laid out on the instructions that came with our tickets. For the next couple of hours this would be where we would stand and wait to move toward our gate. It wasn’t until much later that an officer finally explained to as many of us that could hear him that we were going to have to move down a block and approach the security area from another side.

Crowds were pressing in from all sides and it seemed we would never move because our “path” was being filled from other directions. As we stood near the barriers we noticed that each time the police would move another barrier would be opened and people would run toward the gate. In the end the barriers were finally broken down, the police moved aside and we were wafted toward the gate as we clung to our children to ensure as best we could their safety.

We could see now that the line was moving toward a security area to the left. It didn’t take too long for us to be pressed into the funnel to the security area. Once in we went through the security checkpoint and made our way up to the silver section just behind the reflecting pool where a great number of people were already standing to witness the event. We picked a spot and felt we could breathe again as we waited for the events to begin. We watched behind us as people were still flooding in to the security checkpoint and filtering their way into the area.
Plastic and steel fences had been erected to leave lanes open through the area to allow safety and security workers to get in and out of the crowd. Then the crowd just trampled down the security fence and went where they desired. It was a constant struggle for the lone police officer to keep this lane cleared out – people just didn’t seem to care. At about the same time in front of us the entire crowd suddenly surged forward in a great mass – breaking down another fence and swarming onto statues and into areas previously blocked off. We were a little concerned about the failure of the very limited security forces, but were hopeful that our little spot would remain safe.

Then it happened the crowds broke down the barriers that were guiding people through the security checkpoint and a mass of people charged toward us. I was away from my wife and moved quickly to get near her. We watched amazed as a screaming throng drove toward us. The officer attempting to keep the safety lanes cleared took down his tape and departed the scene. I then made a decision as a father – my wife and children’s safety trumped viewing the inauguration. We couldn’t really get out while the mob was running, so we watched carefully and waited. As we waited our hearts were broken as President Bush was loudly booed when he was announced, and people continued trite conversations during Rick Warren’s invocation

The running seems to have ended so we made our way quietly away from the area. It was no longer secure or ticketed. We went all the way around the capital seeking sanctuary in Senator Session’s office. We had gone from having a really good view of this historical event to having to leave for the safety and protection of our family.

The amazing part to us is that we had been here just four years ago and witnessed a very different scene four years ago at the last inauguration. So now we were starting to get the picture of change in our country. While I think that if Obama and his family were standing with us on the mall he would probably have left with us to protect his own wife and children – I also think he has ignited an unintended change in the fabric of our society - a change that elevates our immediate desires to trump our safety, security and future.

Four years ago two things were true – first of all there was plenty of security. A very strong presence that enforced the plan laid out before the inauguration began. This day there was very little security that tried to enforce a seemingly random plan and eventually gave up and left. I was not at all comforted by this change, but it didn’t really surprise me since the left side of our country wants freedom without boundaries and has great distain for the military and order. It was more important to allow the throngs to pay homage to the new “rock star” president than it was to preserve safety and the integrity of this transfer of power ceremony that has gone on in our country since it was founded. In retrospect I wonder if the police didn’t actually keep things safer by retreating – it may be that confronting this particular mob would have escalated to a point that could not be controlled.

Secondly four years ago the vast majority honored the security that was in place. Nobody pressed past boundaries. We never heard the phrase “they can’t arrest us all” uttered by anyone in the crowd. We actually saw protesters four years ago who were able to speak their minds and show their opinions. The difference was they were very few in number and while lots of riot police were standing visibly by they were allowed to continue as long as safety rules were observed. This time it was much different – the majority of people in attendance felt that their will to get past the checkpoints justified them breaking down the barriers and darting through the few police that were there.

The will of the people is an interesting thing – it seems in the case of what we observed during the inauguration that the will of the people won out over the rule of law. I was disappointed, but I don’t completely fault the security people – they were highly outnumbered and this particular crowd was not at all interested in compliance. In a bizarre way they may have helped things pass without further incident by not trying to suppress the will of non-conformance to the rules in place.

We stayed on in DC several more days to see some of the sights and found as we went from place to place in the capital city that there was a theme that kept recurring. Many of our great leaders had sacrificed their popularity for the good of the country – to do what they thought was best. I’m glad we stayed, and I’m really glad we took the time to see our Nation’s capital.
The first one I noticed was in a brochure about the Washington monument. It is an easy point to miss, but a huge point to understand. George Washington after his victory over the most powerful army in the world could have any position in the new union that he desired, but he relinquished his position. He could have literally been proclaimed king, but had the wisdom to make way for the representative republic we enjoy today. This moment in time was possibly one of the bravest – most noble acts of Washington’s life. He made a huge personal sacrifice that paved the way to an amazing democracy.

In similar fashion I found man y additional examples of presidents who made this similar sacrifice in the National Portrait Gallery. I was surprised to learn there that Lyndon Johnson – who was president when I was born, was saddled with the same problem of having hard choices cast a shadow on his presidency. In the gallery I found many examples of this same sacrifice of leadership. I hope our new president is willing to cash in his popularity for the safety and security of our great land.

The capital itself is an amazing testimony to our forefathers – the building itself is a testimony to the balance they sought by designing a government with three equal branches, and a congress with two equal parts. Everything from the movie to the tour itself was a testimony to the wisdom of our founding fathers, but the best part of our visit to the capital was sitting in the house gallery and listening to a representative from Indian speaking personally of his knowledge of Bush and how we all owe him our respect for leading the country with a steady resolve. He noted a moment in time where Bush came into the room having been advised by all to pull out of Iraq. Bush said that Lincoln had been through many generals to find the right one. Bush said he had found the right man in Patraes and that while seemingly everyone thought we should retreat – Bush said he had decided to win. The surge worked and Iraq is a much different place today.

I’m sad that Bush was booed so loudly from the silver section where we were standing, and I’d like the opportunity to thank him for giving me the gift of his popularity in exchange for great strides in the war on terror. I like the idea that our leaders are willing to do what is best for us, and not just follow every wind of change. Not all change is good – some change is a great idea, but other change – like the will of a mob winning that day against security for that very mob’s protection is a change that is not a good thing.

Another totally amazing place was the library of congress – seemingly every stone in the building is a testimony to a great nation. Our forefathers knew that knowledge in every area was extremely important to the success of our union. Another example of personal sacrifice was Thomas Jefferson who after the British burned the first library of Congress sold his personal collection of books to congress for far less that what he had paid for it. The union was more important to him than holding on to a library he had worked his whole life to collect.

I’m not opposed to change – I’d just like to know what type of change we are talking about. I don’t want to change a country and government founded on the principal that all men are created equal and endowed by their creator with the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. I don’t want to change an economy that allows all of us to pursue our dreams. I don’t want to change to an invasive government that regulates its way into our freedoms. I don’t want to change to a country that is at risk for violence from terrorist both within and without because of the emasculation of our defense and security. I saw a glimpse of this in DC and it was a frightening to me.

Evolution and the Logical End

I have always been a creationist, but recently some implications of the evolutionary theory have begun to bother me. If we assume that evolution is a true theory there are some implications we must face.

First of all our country was founded on a statement in the Declaration of Independence that all men are "created" equal and that they are endowed by their creator with certain rights including life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. So for more than 200 years our country has operated on the premise that God created man and is the giver of rights, which means that the government could only protect rights - it could never give or take away those rights.

If we take "God" out of the picture we have a problem - now instead of God gives to people who consent to government we have only people and government. If people are "over" government that can easily lead to anarchy, and if government is over people that leads to tyranny. God is the balancing factor required for our republic to work. Having God in the equation allows us to be a balanced republic ... without him chaos is the inevitable result.

There is another problem as well, and a quite serious one. If evolution is true then as Darwin pointed out it is necessary for the survival of the fittest to be the governing principal as species continue to evolve. The continuing to evolve is the problem because it means that among men there are various stages of evolution represented, therefore all men are not only "not created", but they are also not equal! Equality among men comes from creation - in the world view of evolution men are animals and the "elite" or "more evolved" will overcome the "less evolved" because they are better, smarter, etc...

Survival of the fittest is a very scary concept ... it justifies actions of men like Hitler who were acting on the belief that their race was superior to others. It justifies various types of slavery and the existence of the "elite" who will naturally overcome the rest of the population. I refuse to accept a theory as fact, especially when it forces me to also assume that either I am superior to others, or they to me. The "elite" don't exist under creation, but under evolution they must.